Harristhal & Allison affidavits.
I received copies of the Harristhal and Allison affidavits today in the jurisdiction hearing in the defamation case. Harristhal's affidavit came to 129 pages! All I can guess is that he's charging Reynolds by the word.
It included a complete copy of one of David Ritz's depositions, even though David is not a party to the defamation suit. It included a large number of items taken from David's disk and other sources which are not even remotely relevant to the issue of jurisdiction.
Well, anyway, my response is online by now, I think I answered fairly well.
As for Allison, he basically includes excerpts from my web site and says they "target" North Dakota somehow, and he includes a couple of usenet posts and claims that I "directed" them to the newsfeeds.com servers.
It included a complete copy of one of David Ritz's depositions, even though David is not a party to the defamation suit. It included a large number of items taken from David's disk and other sources which are not even remotely relevant to the issue of jurisdiction.
Well, anyway, my response is online by now, I think I answered fairly well.
As for Allison, he basically includes excerpts from my web site and says they "target" North Dakota somehow, and he includes a couple of usenet posts and claims that I "directed" them to the newsfeeds.com servers.
Labels: legal, Reynolds, Reynolds_v_Falk, SLAPP
2 Comments:
How come Harristhal isn't spelled correctly?
My bad, thanks for the heads-up.
Post a Comment
<< Home